Ransomware Delivery Mechanisms [Part 1]
Ransomware has become one of the most serious security threats today. Practically every business, public organization (including local governments, healthcare institutions or public transport systems) or private company, and even individuals, are under attack.
Regardless of the type of victim, the aim of the attacker is always the same: infect the users’ systems and deny them access to their most valuable assets, such as confidential or corporate data. Typically, this is done by encrypting the most important documents, making them unreadable, until a ransom for the decryption key is paid. While the actual amounts that are paid are most likely much higher than what is known publicly, many millions of dollars have been reported to be paid each month by the victims to cybercriminals for restoring their critical data.
In this blog series, we focus on different aspects of this lucrative business. The first post looks into the delivery mechanisms for ransomware, which file types are commonly used for ransomware distribution, and how an infection typically takes place. In the follow-up posts, we will dive into evasion techniques used by recent ransomware families, and provide details of how this class of malware operates.
The vast majority of ransomware attacks seen today are distributed using spam and phishing emails, or via compromised websites and “malvertising” (a practice where attackers use web advertisements to spread malicious code).
The below infographic compares the two basic mechanisms for delivering the ransomware payload, as well as the artifacts used as part of the attack:
Interestingly, when ransomware is delivered via Microsoft Office documents, we frequently see two types of techniques for communicating with the command-and-control (C&C) server for downloading the final payload: some variants execute a separate script (typically wscript.exe or powershell.exe), others implement the download directly via a macro in Microsoft Office (typically using an obfuscated VBA-based downloader). For the latter, C&C requests come from the context of Microsoft Office, which has an advantage over executing a separate script: these can be mitigated somewhat trivially by blacklisting the execution of untrusted processes (for example wscript.exe) via Software Restriction Policies. While such policies are usually only in place in tightly-controlled corporate environments, these may be the most-lucrative targets for an attacker.
Delivery via websites: The right-hand side in the infographic shows a typical infection via drive-by-download attacks. In this scenario, a user visits a compromised website (or follows a malicious advertisement) redirecting him (or her) to an Exploit Kit landing page, which triggers the installation of the ransomware payload.
In some cases, attackers make use of an additional layer, a so-called gate, between the infected website and the landing page. This gate allows the attacker to filter the potential victims by specific criteria, such as geo-location, browser user-agent, or request referrer. Depending on these criteria, the attacker can load the most applicable attack into the user’s environment. For example, it could detect and exploit unpatched 3rd party software (such as Flash Player or Java plugin), or trick the visitor into downloading and executing a payload directly via a social-engineering scheme. Below is one of the messages that prompts a victim to update the Chrome’s font by downloading an executable file:
Choosing the ransomware delivery mechanism is mostly a question of money. Spreading spam is cheaper, but does not always lead to the successful attack as the attacker must persuade the end-user to open or execute a file (sometimes to enter a password while opening a password-protected document).
Renting an Exploit Kit infrastructure, in turn, can be very costly (reported up to $7,000 per month), but is usually much more effective in the sense of stealth and flexibility (an attacker may choose a specific payload). The likelihood of a successful infection in case the system is not up-to-date is higher, as there is no need to lure a potential victim into assisting the attack since the malware will be delivered and installed silently without any user interactions once he/she visits an infected web-page.
File Type Distribution
Using the Lastline Knowledge Base, we can find what types of files are typically used for spreading different ransomware families. More specifically, we looked at files analyzed in Lastline datacenters in recent months that exhibited ransomware-specific behaviors as part of the analysis run. In an upcoming sequel in this blog series, we will take a more detailed look and describe how we classify such behavior.
The fact that ransomware is predominantly delivered via scripting languages may be a forecast of what we will see for future malware in general: a shift towards exploitation through scripting. This is because, unlike binary programs, script code is somewhat easier to obfuscate, which helps in defeating most traditional antivirus software. Furthermore, scripts are still less likely to be blocked on the network (e.g., when attached to an email). We will explore this concept much further in another follow-up post to this series.
Ransomware is a lucrative business and attackers can choose from an arsenal of delivery mechanisms for targeting their victims. In this first post in our series on Ransomware attacks, we explored the first stage of the attack chain, presenting various delivery mechanisms. In our next post, we will look at the common behaviors of this type of malware, and how the Lastline analysis system can use these commonalities to prevent this type of attack and protect users from losing valuable data.
Latest posts by Alexander Sevtsov (see all)
- Uncovering Nation-Specific, Targeted Attacks ( . . . without Knowing Korean) - September 26, 2017
- Ransomware Network Communication [Part 3] - July 14, 2017
- Ransomware: Too Overt to Hide [Part 2] - April 13, 2017